The bench disposed of two infructuous writ petitions after the charge sheet was filed. Petitioners were granted liberty to approach the trial court for discharge.
Petitions disposed with liberty to file application for discharge in trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-wp-1833-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1833 OF 2013
Tarlok Didar Singh Lugani...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1834 OF 2013
Aman Tarlok Singh Lugani...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the State.
Mr. Dilip Ghag (API) is present.
CORAM :V.M. KANADE &
P.D. KODE JJ.
DATE :SEPTEMBER 10, 2014
P.C.:
1. None appears on behalf of the
petitioners. Learned APP appearing on behalf of
the State on instruction from API. Dilip Ghag
submitted that now the charge-sheet is filed and
Vishal Parekar
8-wp-1833-2013
therefore the petition has become infructuous.
Petitions are therefore, disposed of. Liberty
however is granted to the petitioners to file an
application for discharge in the trial Court.
However, if such application is made, it may be
considered on merits and in accordance with law.
2/2
Vishal Parekar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions which have become infructuous following the filing of charge-sheet should be dismissed or disposed of.
Tarlok Didar Singh Lugani
Aman Tarlok Singh Lugani
State of Maharashtra
V.M. KANADE
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court