Writ petition and contempt petition disposed due to want of prosecution. Petitioners did not appear despite notices; matter deemed abandoned by parties.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-cp-181-2014
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.181 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8758 OF 2013
___________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of
Coram, Appearances, Court’s or Court's or Judge's orders
directions and Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioners.
CORAM :V.M. KANADE, &
P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE :SEPTEMBER 10, 2014
******
P.C.:
.None appears on behalf of
the petitioner. It appears that
petitioners are not keen in
pursuingthematter.The
petition is disposed of for want
of prosecution.
1/1
Vishal
Unknown Petitioners
Unknown Respondents
V.M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court