Two writ petitions were withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners after taking instructions. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petitions without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 to 4-wp-3035-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3035 OF 2011
Mayur Mahesh Kurne & Ors....Petitioners
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.3761 OF 2011
Moinuddin Shamsuddin Bagwan...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.3762 OF 2011
Moinuddin Shamsuddin Bagwan...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.3763 OF 2011
Moinuddin Shamsuddin Bagwan...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents
Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishan, for the Petitioners.
Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for the State.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
1 to 4-wp-3035-2011
CORAM :V.M. KANADE &
P.D. KODE JJ.
DATE :SEPTEMBER 05, 2014
P.C:
.Mentioned, not on board. Upon mentioning
taken on board.
2.Learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioners after taking instructions seek
leave to withdraw the petitions. Petitions are
allowed to be withdrawn and are disposed of.
2/2
Vishal Parekar
Mayur Mahesh Kurne & Ors
Moinuddin Shamsuddin Bagwan
State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court