Since a substantial part of the contractual term is completed, it was not fit and proper to keep the writ petition pending. The legal question and issue were kept open for decision in an appropriate case and the writ petition was disposed of without further comment or any substantive ruling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1776 OF 2011
The Fishermans Co-operative Society Ltd.,
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.Chaitanya V.Dharurkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.K.G.Patil, Additional G.P. for respondent / State. Mr.R.B.Bhosale, Advocate for respondent No.3.
(CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, JJ.)
DATE : 04/02/2014
PER COURT :
we do not deem it fit and proper to keep this writ petition pending.
By keeping open the legal question and issue for being decided in an
appropriate case, the writ petition is disposed of.
( RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
khs/Feb,2014/wp1776-11
The Fishermans Co-operative Society Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
