Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn, accompanied by liberty to pursue an application seeking cancellation of an allotment in favour of respondent No.6. No costs awarded.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue application seeking cancellation of allotment in favour of respondent No.6.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1168 OF 2013
Mahesh Tukaram Bharshankar PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.S.B.Parnere, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent/State. Mr.Alok Sharma, A.S.G.I. For respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Mr.H.U.Dhage, Advocate for respondent No.7.
(CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, JJ.)
DATE : 04/02/2014
PER COURT :
made, seeking cancellation of the allotment in favour of respondent
No.6. Writ petition is, therefore, allowed to be withdrawn with liberty
as prayed. No costs.
( RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
khs/Feb,2014/wp1168-13
Mahesh Tukaram Bharshankar
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadhikari
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
