The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 1647 of 2011 as infructuous due to loss of due process by passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1647 OF 2011
Narayan Dattatray Kadekar PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS
Mr.G.S.Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.V.D.Godbharle, A.G.P. for respondent/State.
(CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, JJ.)
DATE : 04/02/2014
PER COURT :
rendered infructuous by passage of time. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
( RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.) ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
khs/Feb,2014/wp1647-11
Narayan Dattatray Kadekar
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
RAVINDRA V. GHUPE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
