Basantilal Kajodimal Mandot and 3 Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
Case brief
What is this about?
os.doc IN
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wpl 1746.14 os.doc
k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1746 OF 2014
Basantilal Kajodimal Mandot & Ors. ... Petitioners. V/s. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay ... Respondent.
Mr. Shailesh S. Redekar for the Petitioners. Mr. A.S. Joshi for Respondent-MCGB.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : JULY 21, 2014.
P.C. :
The Petitioners entitlement to an alternate accommodation has
already been decided and accordingly communicated to take further steps. Therefore, the present Petition is disposed of accordingly with liberty to the Petitioners to make representations for some other suitable alternate accommodation, if any. We have not expressed anything on the merits. No costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
katkam
1/1
Basantilal Kajodimal Mandot & Ors.
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay
Anoop V. Mohta
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court