Discharged the writ petition and disposed of the contempt petition based on a statement by counsel for respondent no. 4 that the parties had settled the matter, resulting in no cause to contest.
Rule discharged in writ petition; contempt petition disposed of with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 212 wp 4213.98 with cp 54.05 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4213 OF 1998 WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.54 OF 2005
Shri Nitin Shrirang Mudalgikar & Ors. ... Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents.
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. Sudhir Prabhu i/b Mr. G.H. Keluskar for Respondent no.4.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : JULY 17, 2014.
P.C. :
makes a statement that the parties have settled the matter, therefore, nothing survives in the present Petition. The Writ Petition No.4213 of
1998 is accordingly disposed of with liberty. Rule discharged.
3 In view of above, as there is no cause survive to contest. The Contempt Petition no.54 of 2005 is disposed of. No costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
katkam
1/1
Shri Nitin Shrirang Mudalgikar
The State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mohta
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
