Writ petition disposed upon settlement. Petitioners and relevant respondents signed consent terms and recorded undertaking. No objection raised to signatures or authorization.
Disposal of writ petition in view of consent terms signed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 wpl 781.14 os.doc
k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.781 OF 2014
Ashok J. Shah & Ors. ... Petitioners. V/s. Municipal Corporation for Gr. Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents.
Mr. Piyush M. Shah for the Petitioners. Mr. A.R. Joshi for Respondent nos.1 and 2 – MCGM. Mr. D.C. Pathak with Mr. Anil B. Lawand for Respondent nos.3 to 7.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : JULY 21, 2014.
P.C. :
1/2
2 wpl 781.14 os.doc
k
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
katkam
2/2
Ashok J. Shah & Ors.
Municipal Corporation for Gr. Mumbai & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
