The petition before the High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad was disposed of in the petitioner's favour with the option to avail of the alternate remedy kept open. No substantive order on the merits was recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp1704.13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1704 OF 2013
Naryan Gulabchand Banswal
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.Prashant D. Suryawanshi, advocate for the petitioner Mr.V.H.Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.N.B.Khandare, advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.K.B.Borde, advocate for Respondents No.4, 6 & 7.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
V.K.JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 23rdSeptember, 2014
PER COURT:
Keeping open option to the petitioner to avail of alternate remedy, available in law, writ petition stands disposed of.
V.K.JADHAV R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/wp1704.13
Naryan Gulabchand Banswal
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.BORDE
V.K.JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
