The court directed the petitioner to approach the Sub-Divisional Officer for a speedy decision on the pending appeal accordingly disposed the writ petition.
Writ petition disposed of; petitioner directed to seek speedy decision from Sub-Divisional Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5082.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5082 OF 2014
Arjun Bhikaji Pawar .. PETITIONER VERSUS The Sub-Divisional Officer Vaijapur .. RESPONDENT
Mr. E. S. Murge, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. V. D. Godbharale, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT :
( V. K. JADHAV ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Arjun Bhikaji Pawar
The Sub-Divisional Officer Vaijapur
R.M. Borde
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
