The High Court dismissed a writ petition where a former employee claimed entitlement to back wages and service restoration. The Court held that since the petitioner had already accepted payment as an unskilled worker and was not in service since 2009, his grievance was time-barred.
The writ petition was disposed of; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 1655.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1655 OF 2014
Keshav Mukund Mundhe .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Avinash R. Borulkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. S. Tope, Govt. Pleader for the Respondent No. 1. Shri E. S. Murge, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT :
. Mr. Borulkar, the learned counsel submits that, the petitioner was permanent employee. The management of the school was transferred. However, the petitioner was not continued in service. The whole record was transferred. The petitioner ought to have been taken in service. The petitioner is entitled for backwages.
2 wp 1655.14
filed writ petition which has been disposed of.
[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Nov. 14
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to back wages and continuation in service after receiving payment as an unskilled worker.
Whether the writ petition regarding alleged non-continuation in service could be entertained after a long delay.
Keshav Mukund Mundhe
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
