This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 1033.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1033 OF 2011
Hanuman Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Bindigihal Dist. Latur through President and another
.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri B. N. patil, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri V. R. Sonwalkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for petitioners submits that, the petitioners pursuant to the interim orders were permitted to conduct examination for March/April 2011. It is further submitted that, pursuant to the interim orders for the next year it was also continued, however, subsequently in the year 2013 it was discontinued.
2 In the light of the above, nothing survives in the present writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of. Rule discharged.
bsb/Nov. 14
Hanuman Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Bindigihal Dist. Latur
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
