The petitioner sought to have the writ petition disposed of as infructuous due to subsequent developments. The High Court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition as infructuous.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1409.2013
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1409 OF 2013
Mahalaxmi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. Jalna, through it's Chairman Shri Dadarao Bhaurao Tupkar
... Petitioner
Versus
Santosh Dnyaneshar Pawar and others
...Respondents..
Mr Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner Mr Sudarshan J. Salunke, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3
CORAM : N. W. SAMBRE, J. DATED : 02ND JULY, 2014.
PER COURT : -
Mr Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi, the learned Counsel for
the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, the cause which is brought before this Court has rendered infructuous.
Considering the submission advanced on behalf of the
learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petitions is disposed of as infructuous.
( N. W. SAMBRE, J. )
Punde
Mahalaxmi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. Jalna
Santosh Dnyaneshar Pawar
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
