Writ petition challenging the Tahsildar's refusal to make a crop mutation entry for the year 1997-98 in the petitioner's name. The petitioner failed to demonstrate a source of entry in the revenue record. The High Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP140.2013
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 140 OF 2013
Vitthal Mohan Patil Dead Through His L.Rs. 1) Bhagwan S/o Vitthal Patil and others
... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
... Respondents
Mr P. P. Khandagale Patil, Advocate for petitioners Mr D. V. Tele, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 Mr P. R. Patil, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 and 7
CORAM : N. W. SAMBRE, J. DATED : 02ND JULY, 2014.
PER COURT:-
WP140.2013
-2-
property in question as a power of attorney holder of the respondent after the respondent succeeded in the civil proceedings which has attained finality upto Apex Court.
out. Writ Petition stands dismissed.
Punde
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Tahsildar's order refusing to make a crop mutation entry in the name of the petitioner.
Vitthal Mohan Patil Dead Through His L.Rs. 1 Bhagwan S/o Vitthal Patil and others
The State of Maharashtra
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
