The High Court of Bombay dismissed two writ petitions after counsellers for the petitioners sought and were granted leave to withdraw them. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
903WP)11228.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 11228 OF 2013
Apeksha Subhash Kadam .. Petitioner
Versus The Principal, Ganga Education Society's Ayurved College & Ors.
.. Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2014
Manzur Salim Haldar & Anr.
.. Petitioners
Versus
The Principal, Ganga Education Society's Ayurved College & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Ramesh L. Majgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Y. R. Mishra a/w N. R. Prajapati, Advocate for the respondentUOI.
Mr. Sachin Bhaskar Shetye, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for the respondent-State.
Ms. Anjali Helekar i/b Neil Helekar, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 in W.P. No. 752/14.
CORAM:-NARESH H. PATIL & A. P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED :- 19/12/2014
1/2
2
903WP)11228.13
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in both the petitions seeks leave to withdraw both the petitions. Leave granted. Writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
(A.P. BHANGALE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
md.saleem
2/2
Apeksha Subhash Kadam
The Principal, Ganga Education Society's Ayurved College
Manzur Salim Haldar & Anr.
NARESH H. PATIL
A. P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
