In a review petition, the two-judge bench dismissed the challenge to the lower court order, holding the plea regarding a wrong statement by the State Government lacked merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
18)RPWST32752.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 32752 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2971 OF 2014
Pritam Jaykumar Gandhi & Ors.
.. Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr.J. S. Kapre, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for the respondent
CORAM:-NARESH H. PATIL & A. P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED :- 19/12/2014
P.C.
Heard.
2 The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted
that a wrong statement was made by the State Government, regarding existence of the road.
3 We are not inclined to entertain the review petition
on the ground pressed by the learned counsel.
1/2
2
18)RPWST32752.14
dismissed.
(A.P. BHANGALE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
md.saleem
2/2
Pritam Jaykumar Gandhi & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
NARESH H. PATIL
A. P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
