The Testamentary Suit and Testamentary Petition were dismissed for want of prosecution as the Plaintiff was absent. The order was disposed of by the learned Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ta 61 of 1998 (971).sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.61 OF 1998 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.486 OF 1998
Kalpana Kiran Parekh ….Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs.
Smt. Krishnalata S. Dharadhar ….Respondent/Defendant
None for Plaintiff
None for Defendant
CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 26th JUNE, 2014.
P.C.:-
Testamentary Suit as well as Testamentary Petition are dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)
1/1
ssp
Kalpana Kiran Parekh
Smt. Krishnalata S. Dharadhar
S.J.KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
