Osborne D. Dias and Anr. Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a testamentary suit and petition for want of prosecution, noting the plaintiff's failure to comply with a previous order passed by a different judge for three consecutive years.
What did the court decide?
Testamentary Suit no.95 of 1998 and Testamentary Petition no.946 of 1998 dismissed.
What the court decided
ts 95 of 1998 (976).sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.95 OF 1998 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.946 OF 1998
Osborne B. Dias and Anr. ….Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs.
Gladys Stan ….Respondent/Defendant
None for the Plaintiff. Mr. Denzil D'Mello, for Defendant.
CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 26th JUNE, 2014.
P.C.:-
- None for the Petitioner/Plaintiff. It is pointed out by
the learned Advocate for the Defendant that the Plaintiff has since the last three years failed to comply with the order passed by this Court (Coram : Mrs. Roshan Dalvi, J.) dated 01-08-2011. In view thereof, the above Testamentary Suit as well as Testamentary Petition are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Osborne B. Dias and Anr.
- respondent
Gladys Stan
Coram
S.J.Kathawalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S. G.M. Traders, a Proprietory Concern of Mr. Aslam Quereshi Vs M/S. Neon Steel and Alloys Ltd. Cin No. U27100MH2009PLC193425
Pravinkumar Khimji. Vs Urmila S.Melkoni Daulatben Mekcani and Chandraben Shah Kantilal KHIMJIandANR
Churu Trading Co. P.Ltd. Vs Nakshtra Sofare P.Ltd.
Amit R. Dhirwani HUF Vs M/S. Novelty Power and Infratech Limited.