The Testamentary Suit No. 39 of 1992 and Petition No. 651 of 1989 were dismissed for want of prosecution in the absence of representation by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
959-TS-39-1992
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 39 OF 1992
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 651 OF 1989
Pravinkumar Khimji … Petitioner Versus 1. Kantilal Khimji & Anr. … Defendants
None for Plaintiffs None for Defendant
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 25TH JUNE, 2014
P.C.:
None for the Plaintiffs. In view thereof, the above
Testamentary Suit as well as the Petition are dismissed for want of prosecution.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
Pravinkumar Khimji
Kantilal Khimji & Anr.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
