The High Court of BMC at Bombay rejected a review petition in a Writ Petition, finding no error apparent on the face of the record and no grounds for review.
Review Petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
revptnst-11811.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.11811 of 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1353 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri A.M. Joshi for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ DATED : 8TH JULY 2014
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Petitioner. There is not error apparent on the face of record. Even otherwise, there is no ground for review. The Review Petition is rejected.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record to grant review.
Petitioner
Respondent
A.S. OKA
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court