Allowed
Pandurang Babu Mulik v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/1609/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cao-1609.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1609 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.11811 of 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1353 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri A.M. Joshi for the Applicant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ DATED : 8TH JULY 2014
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. Sufficient cause is made out. The delay is condoned. The Application is allowed.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
The Applicant
A.S. OKA
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court