The Public Interest Litigation was disposed of as it was not pressed by the petitioner's advocate in view of an amending act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
G.A.Ghule [P.A.]
1/1
pil 148.14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 148 OF 2014
DEVICHAND YADAVRAO BOBADE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Appearance =>
Mr. D.S. Bagul, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.P. More, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for the State of Maharashtra.
CORAM : B.P. Dharmadhikari & A.M. Badar, JJ. DATE : 8th December, 2014.
Per Court :-
In view of Amending Act 17 Of 2014, Advocate D.S. Bagal does not press P.I.L. Mr. P.P. More, learned Asstt.Govt.Pleader for the State of Maharashtra is present. P.I.L. is disposed of, as not pressed.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Devichand Yadavrao Bobade
State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
