A public interest litigation withdrawal was allowed with liberty to challenge a subsequent State Level Expert Appraisal Committee decision. The court disposed of the petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 222-13
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 222 OF 2013
Ramchandra Tukaram Maske & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs.
The District Collector, Solapur & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. M. A. Choudhary, for the Petitioners. Mr. A. B. Vagyani, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sarang Aaradhye, for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 3, 2014
PC.
. In view of the decision taken by in the 2nd Special Meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee-2 held on 27th January, 2014, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the said decision. PIL is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty, as prayed. PIL is accordingly disposed of.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Ramchandra Tukaram Maske & Ors.
The District Collector, Solapur & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
