The High Court of Bombay bench at Aurangabad dismissed an application seeking maintenance. The court held that the applicant was bargaining and offered only a partial deposit despite the trial court having granted maintenance to the wife and daughter.
Application rejected with costs of Rs. 5,000/.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2717 OF 2014 IN FCA/3/2014
SHANKAR KACHRU KEDARE VERSUS PUNJABAI SHANKAR KEDARE AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.V. Gore. Mr. R.R. Mane, Advocate h/f
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 5TH DECEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT:
1] The applicant/appellant is bargaining with the court. He says that amount of Rs. 50,000/- will be deposited. Lateron, it is urged that 50% of the amount will be deposited. The trial court has granted maintenance under Section 18 to wife and daughter. Application is rejected with costs of Rs.5,000/-.
[A.M. BADAR] [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI] JUDGE JUDGE.
JUDGE.
grt/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant's offer to deposit a partial maintenance amount warrants allowing the rejected application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHANKAR KACHRU KEDARE
PUNJABAI SHANKAR KEDARE
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
