The petitioner argued that a subsequent order in a related writ petition rendered the present PIL moot. The court disposed of the PIL with no substantive order.
The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pvr 1/1 11PIL138-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.138 OF 2014
Gururaj Dilip Pore.
...Petitioner.
V/s.
1.The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents.
Ms.Leena Patil, for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.B.Vagyani, Addl.G.P. For Respondent no.1.
CORAM: A.S. OKA & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 22, 2014 .
P.C. :
1/1
Gururaj Dilip Pore
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
