The court disposed of a Notice of Motion taken by Defendant No. 1 to vacate an expired status-quo order. As the order stipulated a two-week duration that had ended without continuation, the motion was disposed of.
Notice of Motion disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44.nms.3606.2011.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3606 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO.1964 OF 2009
Gurusharan Pal Singh Bhasin & Anr. ...Plaintiffs
vs
Ravinder Singh Dhall & Ors. ...Defendants
Mr Jayesh Mestry i/b RMG Law Associates for the Plaintiff. Mr Paresh C Mankad with Mr Nihar P. Mankad i/b Mr. Pravin Kadam for the Defendant.
Ms Jyoti Sinha i/b M/s Negandhi Shah & Himayatullah for Defendant No.4 Mr B.B.Parekh for Defendant Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J. JULY 21, 2014
P.C. :
The Notice of Motion is taken out by Defendant No.1 for vacating the status-quo order passed by this Court on 9 November 2009. By this order, status-quo as of the date of order was directed to be maintained for a period of two weeks. The period of two weeks has since come to an end and the statusquo order has not been continued any further. Nothing, therefore, survives in the Notice of Motion and the same is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
( S.C.GUPTE J. )
Pg 1 of 1
Gurusharan Pal Singh Bhasin & Anr.
Ravinder Singh Dhall & Ors.
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
