High Court permitted withdrawal of a suit under consent terms by plaintiffs; accordingly, three Notices of Motion were disposed of with dismissal.
Plaintiffs allowed to withdraw suit; court fees refunded; Notices of Motion dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms1791-11.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1791 OF 2011
IN
SUIT NO.1964 OF 2009
Gurusharan Pal Singh Bhasin And Anr.
...Plaintiffs
vs
Ravinder Singh Dhall And Ors.
...Defendants.
WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.358 OF 2014 IN
SUIT NO.1964 OF 2009
Ravinder Singh Dhall And Ors. ...Applicant
(Original Defendant No.1)
In the matter between
Gurusharan Pal Singh Bhasin And Anr. ...Plaintiffs
vs Ravinder Singh Dhall And Ors. ...Defendants.
Ms. Tanmayi Rajadhyaksha, i/b. RMG Law Associates.
Mr. Nihar Mankad, i/b. Pravin Kadam, for Defendant No.1.
Sampanna Walavalkar, for Defendant No.2.
Vikrant Makhare, i/b. M/s. Negandhi Shah & Himayatullah, for Defendant No.4
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 15, 2014
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the parties tender consent terms duly signed by the parties and their respective Advocates.
Pg 1 of 2
nms1791-11.doc
identification.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 2 of 2
Gurusharan Pal Singh Bhasin
Ravinder Singh Dhall
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
