A notice of motion in a civil suit. No plaintiff appeared on the adjourned date despite prior warnings. The court dismissed the notice for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms 2158-2010.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2158 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2095 OF 2010
Jhavar Developers …Plaintiff vs. A & M Construction Company & Ors. ...Defendants
None for Plaintiff.
Mr.Pankaj Dahibawkar i/b. M/s.Dahibawkar & Co. for Defendant No.1. Mr.J.G. Aradwad-Reddy for Defendant No.4. Mr.Abhijeet Rane for Defendant No.42
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
11 SEPTEMBER 2014
P.C. :
This Notice of Motion is taken out by the Plaintiff inter alia praying for appointment of Court Receiver and injunction in respect of Development Agreements, which form part of the subject matter of the present suit.
The matter was called out on 3 September 2014, when none appeared for the Plaintiff. The matter was stood over as a last chance to today's date. It was made clear that no adjournment would be granted on the adjourned date. Today when the matter is called out, none appears for the Plaintiff.
The Notice of Motion is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Jhavar Developers
A & M Construction Company
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
