Plaintiff sought leave to withdraw a Notice of Motion, stating proceedings are pending under the Rent Control Act. Court dismissed the Notice of Motion as withdrawn.
Notice of Motion dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31.nms.3390.2011.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3390 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 2776 OF 2011
Shashilal R. Naik
...Plaintiff
vs Mary Kutty Emmanual ...Defendant
Mr Bipin Joshi a/w Tejas Joshi for the Plaintiff. Mr Chirag Balsara a/w Vachan Bodke for Defendant No.5.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
SEPTEMBER 16, 2014
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff does not press this Notice of Motion and seeks leave to withdraw the Motion, as the proceedings between the parties are already pending under the Rent Control Act. Notice of Motion is dismissed as withdrawn.
( S.C.GUPTE J. )
Pg 1 of 1
S.C. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
