High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) rejected a continuation application seeking review of a 1995 judgment in a writ petition regarding pension, finding no grounds made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mca100-95
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Misc. Civil Application No. 100 OF 1995
in
Writ Petition No. 605 of 1998
Vyankatesh Gulabrao Deshmukh
vrs.
The Additional Commissioner, and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 25th SEPTEMBER , 2014 .
Heard. No ground has been made out for reviewing the judgment dated 16.1.1995 in Writ Petition No. 604 of 1992. The Misc. Civil Application stands rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Vyankatesh Gulabrao Deshmukh
The Additional Commissioner
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
