This order rejects substantive engagement with the change report proceedings. It merely recalls a previous single bench direction, mandates the District Charity Commissioner to decide pending change reports within six months, and subsequently dismisses the Letters Patent Appeal and the accompanying civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.LPANo.2302012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 230 OF 2012 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 396 OF 2012 in
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 230 OF 2012
Dilip Gajanan Moley & Ors. ... Appellants vs. Nitin Sharad Bhivate & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.S.S.Patwardhan, Advocate for the Appellants. Mrs.Gata P. Mulekar, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mrs.M.S.Bane, B Panel AGP for the Respondent No.6.
CORAM :NARESH H.PATIL and RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, JJ. DATED :12TH JUNE, 2014
P.C.
in Writ Petition No. 2763 of 2012 and the other relevant documents placed on record. It is submitted that after filing the Change Report of the year 2011, successive elections took place to constitute Managing Committee of the Trust. The grievance of the appellant is that said change report proceedings u/s. 41D shall be proceeded with.
1/2
Gaikwad RD
903.LPANo.2302012
(RAVINDRA V.GHUGE,J.) (NARESH .H.PATIL, J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Dilip Gajanan Moley & Ors.
Nitin Sharad Bhivate & Ors.
NARESH H.PATIL
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
