High Court directed the management to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding 6th Pay Commission benefits within two months.
Direct the respondents to decide the pending representation regarding 6th Pay Commission benefits within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp7552.12.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 7552 OF 2012
| Shri Sagar Rajaram Sutar | ... | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| V/s. | ||
| All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) |
||
| Mumbai & ors. | ... | Respondents |
Mr. G.M. Savagave for the petitioner. Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for respondents 5 and 6. Ms. J.P. Pawar, AGP for respondents 2 and 3.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND R.V. GHUGE, JJ . 11th June, 2014.
P.C.
Heard.
2/2 wp7552.12.sxw
two months on its own merits. The decision of the management shall be communicated to the petitioner. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision, the petitioner is at liberty to resort to appropriate remedy.
(R.V. GHUGE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.A.
Shri Sagar Rajaram Sutar
All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)
NARESH H. PATIL
R.V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
