Single judge civil revision applicant sought leave to withdraw his application. The court granted permission and disposed of the application as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
Leave to withdraw the Civil Revision Application granted; Application disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra122.13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.122 OF 2013
Rizwan Hanif Qureshi s/o Hanif Qureshi,
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs,
Aurangabad and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Shri.H.A. Patankar Advocate for Applicant.
Shri.Y.B. Pathan, Advocate for Resp. No.1.
Shri.M.G. Mustafa Advocate for Resp. No.2.
...
CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.
DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2014
ORDER :
1. The learned counsel appearing for Applicant, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Application.
Even otherwise the impugned order, on the face of it,
is interlocutory in nature. Leave granted. The
Revision Application is disposed as withdrawn.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.]
asb/JAN14
Rizwan Hanif Qureshi
Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs, Aurangabad
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court