The High Court ordered the issue of a fresh notice to Respondent No.3 at a specified address. The civil application was disposed of. Amicable jurisdiction is not evident.
Issue of fresh notice to Respondent No.3 returnable on 25th February, 2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca479.14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.479 OF 2014
IN
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.471 OF 2013
Smt. Chitralekha Chandrasen Pawar
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Shri.V.B. Jadhav Advocate h/f. Shri. A.V.
Hon Advocate for Applicant.
Shri.S.R. Palnitkar, A.G.P. for Resp. No.1.
...
CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.
DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2014
ORDER :
1.Issue fresh notice to Respondent No.3 on
the given address, returnable on 25th February,
2014. Civil Application is disposed of.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.]
asb/JAN14
Smt. Chitralekha Chandrasen Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court