Arvind S/O Shivdas Suryawanshi v. Shri A.N. Rai, the Director Hr, Bsnl, New Delhi and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1707cp43.14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Contempt Petition No.43 of 2014
In
Writ Petition No.1177 of 2013 (Shri Arvind s/o Shivdas Suryawanshi v. Shri A.N. Rai, Director, HR, BSNL, and others)
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Petitioner-in-person.
Coram : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik & V.K. Jadhav, JJ. Dated : 17th July, 2014
Heard. None of the prayers made in the instant petition could be made in a contempt petition. We find that substantive prayers are made by the petitioner in the contempt petition. The petitioner, appearing in person, is not able to point out the order of which the contempt is allegedly committed by the respondents.
In this background, the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Judge Judge
pdl
Shri Arvind s/o Shivdas Suryawanshi
Shri A.N. Rai, Director, HR, BSNL
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court