the approvals are bad-in-law and are liable to be set aside. It is not the case of the petitioner in Writ Petition No.5264 of 2012 that none of the employees had completed the probation period satisfactorily. In fact, it was not possible for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.5264 of 2012 to secure the knowledge about the actual appointments of the employees and the completion of the probation period by them. The Assistant Project Officer, Deori, the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development and the Project Officer possessed the relevant record relating to the appointment of the employees and the period during which they worked as such. Though it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.5264 of 2012 at the time of arguments that approval has been granted to some of the teachers, whose services were terminated, we do not find any averment as such in the writ petition and the submission appears to be an afterthought and a lame attempt to ensure that the approvals granted in favour of the employees should be cancelled. There is also no material whatsoever on record to show that a particular employee or for that matter any particular employees of the School had reported on duty under the influence of liquor and that was the reason for the de-recognition of the Ashram School run by the earlier society. Out of the several deficiencies that were found in the Ashram School run by the previous Management, only a vague reference is made about the employees attending the school in an intoxicated condition, without mentioning the names of the employees. We, therefore, find no merit in the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner in Writ Petition No.5264 of 2012 so as to cancel the approvals granted in
