A single judge disposed of a contempt petition raised for alleged non-compliance of an order transferring a petitioner, noting that a review application was pending and no willful disobedience was evident.
The contempt petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.18/2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.18 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1728 OF 2012
Shridhar s/o Gangaram Pawar & anr. ... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
... RESPONDENTS
Shri M.R. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioners Shri S.R. Palnitkar, A.G.P. for State Shri A.S. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.
DATED: 20th January, 2014.
PER COURT :
Contempt Petition No.18/2013
2
filed as the respondent University is ready to transfer the petitioner, but there is difficulty regarding transfer "with post". Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be causing appearance in the Review Application.
fmp/cp18.13
Shridhar s/o Gangaram Pawar & anr.
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
