The High Court at Bombay Appellate Side held that the present civil application did not survive due to the prior disposal of the related appeal and disposed of the matter without further ado.
The civil application has been disposed of as it no longer survives following the disposal of the related appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9114 OF 2013 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 73 OF 2013
(Gopal Rainvilas Sarda V. Kondiba Ganpat Kachkure & Ors.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. N.P. Dhule, Advocate holding for Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for applicant Mr. A.R. Vaidya, Advocate for respondent No. 1 (absent) Mr. R.B. Temak, Advocate holding for Mr. P.R. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 2 Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 4 (absent)
CORAM : A.I.S. CHEEMA, J. DATED : 20th January, 2014.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)
SDM* January-2014/ Civil Application No. 9114.2013
Gopal Rainvilas Sarda
Kondiba Ganpat Kachkure
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
