Dismissed
Bhavesh I Sanghavi v. Stonemann Royale LTD.-U14101MH2006PLC160004
Bombay HCCP/102/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
53.cp.102.13.doc
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 102 OF 2013
Bhavesh I. Sanghavi.....Petitioner
Versus
Stonemann Royale Ltd.....Respondents
____________
Mr. Vishal Thacker i/b M/s. V. Thakers for the Petitioner.
Ms. Sheetal Kumar i/b M/s. Kay Legal & Associates for the
Respondents.
CORAM: G. S. PATEL, J.
DATED : JANUARY 16, 2014.
P.C.:
This petition has not yet been admitted. In the
meantime, parties have settled their disputes and differences and
have executed a Memorandum of Settlement. Consent terms are
tendered. These have been signed by the petitioner, his Advocate,
the authorised signatory on behalf of the respondent, and the
respondents’ advocate. Annexed to the consent terms is also a
memorandum of settlement. Consent terms are taken on record
and marked 'X' for identification.
2.In view thereof, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Bhavesh I. Sanghavi
Stonemann Royale Ltd
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court