Allowed
Bajgrangal Jaju v. the Vyasya Bank Ltd.
Bombay HCCHS/958/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Chamber summons prayer for name substitution was made absolute; suit remanded for 3 February 2014.
What did the court decide?
Amendment to substitute Hitesh Anilkumar Jaju for Anilkumar Bajranglal Jaju ordered.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- CHS958-13.DOC
¶2
agk
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.958 OF 2013 IN SUIT NO.824 OF 1980
¶5
WITH
¶6
SUIT NO.824 OF 1980
¶7
Bajrangalal Jaju
¶8
..Plaintiff.
¶9
Versus
¶10
The Vyasya Bank Limited
¶11
..Defendants.
¶12
Mr. Nitin Parekh i/by M/s. Pious Law Associates, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Arjun Srivastava i/by Ambu Diwanji, for the Defendants.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Bajrangalal Jaju
- respondent
The Vyasya Bank Limited
Coram
AI extract
G.S. Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Charivupurayidathil M. Thomas and Anr. Vs Alice Thomas Nee Alice Gheevarghese
Jagdish Prsad Gupta S/O Sahdev Gupta and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra
Prakash Mohanlal Gawali @ Ahir and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra
Synedrgy Steels Limited Vs the Official Liquidator of M/S. Shree Shankar Steels (P) Ltd.