The High Court of Bombay disposed of an application for extension of time because the respondent stated they did not wish to implement the existing order and intended to seek modification instead.
Application disposed of with liberty to file a fresh Application if occasion arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dss
CAW 393.14 IN 3216.13 (4)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.393 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3216 OF 2013
The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Applicants vs. Shri Dhondu Ganu Gavari since deceased through L.Rs. Shri. Ankush G. Gavari .. Respondent
Mr.N.P. Deshpande, AGP for Applicants. Mr.G.M. Savagave i/b Suman Y. Lengare for Respondent/Original Petitioner.
CORAM : A. S. OKA & M. S. SONAK, JJ. 20TH FEBRUARY 2014.
P.C. :-
Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-original
Petitioner states that the Respondent does not want the Applicants to implement the order dated 2nd May 2013 as the Respondent wants to apply for the modification of the said order. We accept the said statement. In view of the said statement, the Application for extension of time need not to be entertained and the same is disposed of with liberty to file a fresh Application if occasion arises.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
Dinesh
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for extension of time should be entertained when the respondent does not wish to enforce the existing order and intends to seek modification.
The Collector of Pune and ors.
Shri Ankush G. Gavari
A. S. OKA
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
