Kamalkishor Narayandas Laddha v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca830214.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8302 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5068 OF 2014
Kamalkishor s/o Narayandas Laddha
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr.Ajay G. Talhar, advocate for the applicant. Mrs.M.A.Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
V.K.JADHAV, JJ. DATE :20th August, 2014
PER COURT:
Heard. For the reasons recorded in the application, application deserves to be allowed and same is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Amendment to be carried out within one week.
Civil Application stands disposed of.
Post the writ petition for admission on 10.09.2014.
V.K.JADHAV R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/ca830214
Kamalkishor s/o Narayandas Laddha
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court