Disposed
Usha Daulat Nathani and Another v. Dalbirsing and Others
Bombay HCCA/423/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CA 423/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Civil Application No.423 of 2014 In
First Appeal Stamp No.207 of 2014 Usha w/o Daulat Nathani & Anr. .. Applicants.
Versus
Dalbirsing & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. Navandar Mehul Vikas, Advocate, for applicants.
Shri. P.K. Kothari, Advocate, for respondents 3-A and 3-B.
CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 24th JANUARY 2014
PER COURT:
2 CA 423/2014
Appeal No.956 of 2012. Consequently, delay is condoned. CA No.423 of 2014 is allowed. Appeal to be taken up with afore stated appeal. Counsel for respondent nos.3-A and 3- B accepts service of appeal.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
rsl
Usha w/o Daulat Nathani & Anr
Dalbirsing & Others
K.U. Chandiwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court