The Court condoned the delay in bringing legal representatives of respondent Nos. 1A to 1D on record of the appeal and allowed the application for their substitution/bringing on record.
The application to bring legal representatives of respondent No. 1 on record was allowed and the delay of 128 days was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CA 3394 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Civil Application No.3394 of 2013 In First Appeal No.880 of 2012
Mohd. Rashid Nawaz Mohd. Ayub. .. Applicant.
Versus
Mohd Ziyauddin Mohd. Hafizoddin. .. Respondent.
Shri. Amit A Mukhedkar, Advocate, for applicant. Shri. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa, Advocate for respondent Nos.1A to 1D.
CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 24th JANUARY 2014 PER COURT:
Sd/-
(K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
rsl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 128 days in filing application for bringing legal representatives on record is sufficiently explained.
Mohd. Rashid Nawaz Mohd. Ayub
Mohd Ziyauddin Mohd. Hafizoddin
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
