Disposed

Ishwar Prasad G. Khandelwal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Jun 2014APPW/102/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition wherein the petitioner complained that police failed to register an FIR. The Court directed the petitioner to approach the police Grievance Cell for consequential relief and consequently disposed of the main petition and attached applications.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to approach the police Grievance Cell; main petition and attached applications disposed of.

Ishwar Prasad G. Khandelwal Vs the State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

suresh

¶2

211-WPG-2581.2009

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
WRIT PETITION NO.2581 OF 2009

¶4

WITH

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2010
AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2581 OF 2009

¶6

Ishwar Prasad G. Khandelwal.... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
& Others.... Respondents

¶7

Mr. Sandip Jalan for the Petitioner.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP, for the State.

¶8

CORAM: V.M. KANADE &
 P.D. KODE, JJ.

¶9

DATED: JUNE 19, 2014

¶10

P.C:

¶11

1.Learned counsel appearing on behalf of

¶12

the petitioner has submitted that the

¶13

petitioner has taken away the papers from him
and he does not have any instructions. With the
assistance of the learned APP appearing for the

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

suresh 211-WPG-2581.2009

¶16

State, we have perused the petition, the

¶17

annexures thereto and the reliefs claimed by
the petitioner.

¶18

2.The grievance of the petitioner

¶19

appears to be that, though he had filed a
complaint which disclosed commission of a
cognizable offence, no steps were taken by the
police for registration of FIR.

¶20

3.Since this is the main relief which is

¶21

claimed for by the petitioner, in our view, the
petition can be conveniently disposed of by
directing the petitioner to approach the
Grievance Cell which has been constituted by
the police pursuant to direction given by this
Court.

¶22

4.The petitioner shall approach the
Grievance Cell and file his written complaint.

¶23

Page 2 of 3

¶24

suresh 211-WPG-2581.2009

¶25

Upon such complaint being received, the
Grievance Cell shall look into the matter and
take steps and action in accordance with law.
The petition is disposed of.

¶26

5.In view of disposal of the main
petition, the criminal applications do not
survive and they accordingly stand disposed of.

¶27

Page 3 of 3

Ishwar Prasad G. Khandelwal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ishwar Prasad G. Khandelwal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashant Jawahar Shah and Ors. Vs the Police Inspector and Ors.

Dilipp Tukaram Kambale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sameer Madan Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Arun Anant Dhadwe Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ishwar Prasad G. Khandelwal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mir Mozam Ali Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.