The High Court at Bombay addressed an application concerning the delay in trial. Although the applicant had withdrawn his bail application, the court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within one month to expedite justice.
Directed the Trial Court to conclude the trial within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri. Appln. No. 288/14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2014
Anil s/o. Madhukar Khajekar
....Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
....Respondent.
Mr. A.K. Bhosle, Advocate for applicant. Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, APP for State.
CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 29th January, 2014.
ORDER :
Cri. Appln. No. 288/14
2
fixed time.
[ M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.]
ssc/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to conclude the trial within a fixed time despite the earlier bail application being withdrawn.
Anil s/o. Madhukar Khajekar
State of Maharashtra
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
