The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the applicant's application for condonation of a 38-day delay in filing an appeal challenging his conviction, granting the relief upon hearing counsel.
Application for condonation of delay of 38 days in filing appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPA 1522.14.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1522 OF 2014 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL St. NO. 887 OF 2014
Bhuraji Pandurang Mukane. V/s. The State of Maharashtra.
... Applicant.
... Respondent.
Mr. Manoj Badgujar i/b. Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
NOVEMBER 28, 2014.
P.C. :-
This is an Application by which the Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 38 days in filing an Appeal challenging his conviction. We have heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP and for the reasons stated in the Application, Application is allowed and delay is condoned.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(P.V. HARDAS, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 38 days in filing the appeal can be condoned under Article 1522.14.sxw.
Whether the application for condonation of delay should be allowed.
Bhuraji Pandurang Mukane
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
G.S. Kularni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
