Application to condone a 38-day delay in filing an appeal against conviction was allowed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay after hearing counsel.
Application dismissed; delay of 38 days in filing appeal is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPA 1520.14.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1520 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL St. NO. 886 OF 2014
Yogesh Dagadu Mukane.
... Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
Mr. Manoj Badgujar i/b. Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
NOVEMBER 28, 2014.
P.C. :-
This is an Application by which the Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 38 days in filing an Appeal challenging his conviction. We have heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP and for the reasons stated in the Application, Application is allowed and delay is condoned.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 38 days in filing the appeal is condonable under the relevant statutory provisions.
Yogesh Dagadu Mukane
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
