The respondent's counsel sought to withdraw Criminal Application No.232 of 2014. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn while granting liberty to pursue alternative remedies.
Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to utilize alternate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2404apl232.14
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.232 OF 2014
(Col. Deepak Mehta vs. State of Maharashtra) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.farad
Shri Y.R. Salunkhe, Advocate for applicant. Shri M.K. Pathan, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 24, 2014
Shri Salunkhe, learned Counsel for the applicant, seeks liberty to withdraw the criminal application with further liberty to take recourse to alternate remedy available in law.
The criminal application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Deepak Mehta
State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
